Do you think Strauss did the right thing in allowing Australia to replace Haddin for the 3rd Ashes Test? - strauss
I am sure India would do it differently if England had not adopted, was forced Australia, with 10 men and do not play a wicket-keepers! I hope that England lose the game now.
If you think that fair-play, where he was when he, with Sidebottom Elliott, and the second? Hypocrisy?
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Strauss Do You Think Strauss Did The Right Thing In Allowing Australia To Replace Haddin For The 3rd Ashes Test?
9 comments:
I think he had the feeling of being compensated for "catch" in the last event and the delay in the first test
Who cares about what India could do. If you see someone rob a bank, does not mean that you should rob a bank?
Strauss is a man horourable and have done the right thing.
More Haddin may have been able to bat well and is in the form of Manu is certainly less of a threat with the bat.
What could do Haddin broke a finger for the love of God. For a wicketkeeper, which is disastrous! I see no English do the opposite. Order was intended in the spirit of cricket to play, unlike some other teams.
What could do Haddin broke a finger for the love of God. For a wicketkeeper, which is disastrous! I see no English do the opposite. Order was intended in the spirit of cricket to play, unlike some other teams.
The teams are asked to keep the spirit of cricket. Technically, Haddin has not been replaced, but he was right.
If England do not ensured that this was one Karma ******. It was great sportsmanship by Strauss and he has Righ.
If England do not ensured that this was one Karma ******. It was great sportsmanship by Strauss and he has Righ.
If England do not ensured that this was one Karma ******. It was great sportsmanship by Strauss and he has Righ.
England is the home of cricket.
and have the spirit of the game.
sportmenship good.
Post a Comment